[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bgl-discuss] Compilers

To: discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bgl-discuss] Compilers
From: Andrew Elwell <andrewe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:09:16 +0000
Cc: Donald Sinclair <dks@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Pieper <pieper@xxxxxxxxxxx>, discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: discuss-outgoing@bgl.mcs.anl.gov
Delivered-to: discuss@bgl.mcs.anl.gov
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503101537120.29585@recorder.mcs.anl.gov>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503101515570.5774-100000@pcl8.hep.anl.gov> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503101537120.29585@recorder.mcs.anl.gov>
Sender: owner-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:37:47PM -0600, Andrew Siegel wrote:
> did we upgrade compiler at some point?
> 
What version of the compilers are you running? over here at EPCC (UK) we're
still on 

* IBM(R) XL Fortran Enterprise Edition V9.1 for Linux(R) 5724-I08
* IBM(R) XL C/C++ Enterprise Edition V7.0 for Linux(R) 5724-I11

(and no lslpp to tell me the exact versions.. RPM? naaaaah, this is IBM.)


Andrew

-- 
Andrew Elwell, System Administrator EPCC
Tel 0131 445 7833 (ACF Building)
Tel 0131 650 5023 (Rm 3309, JCMB)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------
To add or remove yourself from this mailing list, use the 'notifyme'
command on any BGL machine. To remove: notifyme -n, to add: notifyme -y.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [bgl-discuss] Compilers
  - From: Andrew Siegel

References:
- Re: [bgl-discuss] Comparison between BGL nodes and standard PPCs
  - From: Donald Sinclair
- Re: [bgl-discuss] Comparison between BGL nodes and standard PPCs
  - From: Andrew Siegel

Prev by Date: Re: [bgl-discuss] Comparison between BGL nodes and standard PPCs
Next by Date: Re: [bgl-discuss] Comparison between BGL nodes and standard PPCs
Previous by thread: Re: [bgl-discuss] Comparison between BGL nodes and standard PPCs
Next by thread: RE: [bgl-discuss] Compilers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread