Re: [bgl-discuss] Announcing 2nd BGW Consortium Day

[Ed Jedlicka <jedlicka@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert,

We are still negotiating the contract issue with IBM, so hold off til I can 
get back to you. For item 2,  that is not a problem and for
item 3, a resubmit is fine once we close item 1.

At 04:33 PM 1/10/2006, Robert Fisher wrote:
> Hi Susan, Ed :
>
>   I think we are certainly interested in BGW Consortium Day, but have to
> clarify some issues :
>
>         1) What will IBM require to have the FLASH code run on BGW?
> Recall last time we ran into legal issues with IBM which killed our
> chances of running.
>
>         2) The amount of data than can be transferred back is relatively
> tiny. Is there any way that the run output can be stored at IBM and then
> siphoned back slowly?
>
>         3) Is another proposal from us required, or can be simply resubmit
> our previous proposal?
>
>   Please let me know. I will be in touch with the rest of the FLASH team
> to discuss.
>
>   Best,
>
>   Bob
>
>
> - --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To add or remove yourself from this mailing list, use the 'notifyme'
> command on any BGL machine. To remove: notifyme -n, to add: notifyme -y.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
To add or remove yourself from this mailing list, use the 'notifyme'
command on any BGL machine. To remove: notifyme -n, to add: notifyme -y.