RE: [bgl-discuss] MPI failure, simplified

["Andrew Siegel" <siegela@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Steve. I don't see any problems with that fix in this case, but I
think the idea is that we don't want to change all of our code so that it
can run on BG/L. That is, after all, the point of a having a standard. But
it is a nice fallback option if we need to get some work done in the short
term, which might be the case.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Pieper [mailto:pieper@phy.anl.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 11:28 AM
To: Andrew Siegel
Cc: discuss@bgl.mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [bgl-discuss] MPI failure, simplified 

As I said a week or so ago on this issue, when I had a similar (I think
it was rather similar) problem, I was told to use MPI_SSEND which
completely fixed the problem.  Is there something wrong with that fix
here?

Steve

Steven C. Pieper, Senior Physicist:  spieper@anl.gov  
Argonne National Laboratory, Physics Division, Bldg. 203, Argonne, IL 60439
Phone:  630-252-4232         Fax -6008
Secretary (Donna Nelson or Debra Morrison) -4100

- --------------------------------------------------------------------
To add or remove yourself from this mailing list, use the 'notifyme'
command on any BGL machine. To remove: notifyme -n, to add: notifyme -y.